LIVERPOOL is the fifth worst fly- tipping hotspot in England

LIVERPOOL is the fifth worst fly-tipping hotspot in England, new figures reveal. Data compiled by the GMB union showed there had been more than 54,000 incidents in the last two years – equivalent to 74 every day.

Those of us who live in Liverpool will not be surprised at this yet the Labour council’s reaction to this problem is dreadful. Don’t forget that this time last year they were actively seeking to end the Bulky Bob’s contract which would have made things worse.

Don’t forget that when they took control of the council in 2010 they pledged to run a grot spots campaign and promised to clean up the city. The reality was they invented grot spots and then pretended to clear them. Two in my ward had been reported by us for minor problems with litter and had been promoted to grot spot to make the numbers up.

But the worst and most deep seated problem is the failure of the administration to deal with the re-letting of the contract to Liverpool Enterprise. This was a contract which started well and functioned well for its first few years but after 10 years urgently needed to be renewed. In September last year the council decided that its current market testing revealed that it needed to look afresh at its tendering activity for this work.

Under a provision of ‘urgency’ it broke its own standing orders and extended a publicly procured contract. Some urgency! A decision in September was ‘urgently’ followed up some 11 months later with a report to the cabinet. This report came suspiciously quickly after I stated nosing around after receiving information from a whistle blower.

Despite having 11 months to deal with the problem and sort out its tendering process the report was circulated at 18.03 last Thursday for the cabinet meeting the following day. Moreover as an exempt item I could not access it without giving up two meetings and returning to the council offices. This council has more than whiff of panic about it at the moment.

Major regeneration programmes running behind schedule. Bid applications talked up in March and then not submitted 6 months later and in the meantime the streets are getting dirtier and holier!

Of course the cry will go out that this is all the fault of the dastardly government but as Molesworth would say any fule kno the real fault is with the council not getting to grips with basics and allowing contracts which are no longer fit for purpose to roll on.

Nor is the end in sight. It may well be another year until the procurement process is completed and a new contract put in place to deal with Liverpool’s street scene requirements. So expect grot spots, potholes and litter for many, many months to come

No wonder Liverpool has earned the title in the local media – “Calamity Council”.

About richardkemp

Leader of the Liberal Democrats in Liverpool. Deputy Chair and Lib Dem Spokesperson on the LGA Community Wellbeing Board. Married to the lovely Cllr Erica Kemp CBE with three children and four grandchildren.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to LIVERPOOL is the fifth worst fly- tipping hotspot in England

  1. Catherine Byrne says:

    You’re right, far too many decisions seem to be taken in a hurry, based on hastily pulled together information, and strategy that is more wishful thinking and spin than evidence-based and considered. I was so shocked at the shoddy work of the Policy and Partnerships Office (or Division, or whatever……AKA the Chief Exec’s office – directly answerable to him) as evidenced in its half-baked and inaccurate reports to the Finance and Resources Select Committee that I actually submitted an FOI request to find out a bit more about it.
    As the answer makes clear, these people are responsible for strategies, policies, etc. etc. for a huge slice of council business. Including contracts with our “partners”.
    They certainly have a substantial budget – just over £21 million for this year, of which 3.6 million on staff (23 people). I have yet to find out what the remaining 17 million-odd is actually spent on. That is a pretty substantial budget by any standards. With resources like this, they should be doing a lot better, surely. And if the results are so demonstrably poor, why on earth not spend the money to relieve some of the pressure on all sorts of other essential services, cut to the bone.
    The question is here

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s