The Governement and Baby P

The government has a curious approach to local government. Stick in hundreds of rules and regulations and insist through legislation in establishing strait jackets for local government and then when local government does its best to deliver within those constraints kick it when it’s down.

The UK has one of the best records in the world for dealing with child protection issues. Only four countries have a better record for things like child murders than us. That means day by day; case by case; councils and partners in the Police Force, Health Service and other agencies are getting things right in the vast, vast majority of cases.

I couldn’t be a social worker. I don’t have the skills, the patience or the fortitude to deal with those cases day in and day out. Like society as a whole I leave society’s dirty washing to people who have those aptitudes. We let them deal on our behalf with the things we don’t want to see and the people that we don’t want to acknowledge. Yet we then don’t stand up for them when they are maligned and reviled in the press.

I have no doubt that the Baby P case will have a long-term impact on our caring services. People will have been put off entering social work and the other professions by this. People with overloaded case files will be asked to take on more cases at a time when they will become more risk averse and demand more time to deal with the cases that they already have.

I am not saying that mistakes have not been made in Haringey and that we should not learn from those mistakes. But let me get back to the first point – a lot of what we do is within someone else’s constraints. Just as we have looked at our mistakes should not the Government be looking at theirs?

I have written to Ed Balls and asked him 4 questions which I believe he should have already asked himself at this stage;

1. Is OFSTED up to the job?

The protestations that OFSTED gave totally contradictory reports about the effectiveness of Haringey Children’s Services because the council cheated are just tosh. If the system is that easy to cheat what is the point of the system? If the inspectors have no ‘nose’ for what is real and what is unreal what is the point of having them?

I used to do a lot of inspection work for the Audit Commission and have on two occasions worked alongside JAR teams. The spectacular mundanity of the OFSTED inspectors has never failed to amaze me. Clearly many of them were inspectors because they were no longer up to doing the job. Too often Councils expect Inspector Morse to arrive and instead get Inspector Clouseau.

2. Is there too much bureaucracy?

It is clear to many of us that the paper work introduced after the Victoria Climbie case has simply moved the work of the staff from doing to recording. I have no doubt that paperwork and records needed to be improved but I suspect that it has simply gone too far. When social workers can spend a quarter of their time travelling to cases and 50% of their time recording what they have seen then not much time is left for actually getting to know and understand the often complex families they are dealing with.

3. Has the creation of new super sized Children’s Services Departments worked?

In the case of Haringey the director was clearly a well respected educationalist as was seen by the support from the majority of the School Heads but did she have the experience of ‘social work’ required for her to head a big combined department? I believe that these issues exist in many other councils. Creating a big department does not necessarily mean organisational inter marriage. There are many organisational and cultural ways that could be introduced to ensure that services join up around the children needing them and I believe the time is now right to examine whether the one chosen by the Government is the right one.

In political circles we are already experiencing some difficulty in getting people to become Cabinet Members for this area and for the equally demanding conflicts of the Adult Services positions. I suspect that we will have similar difficulty in future in taking people on to reconcile two related but separate disciplines.

I admit that I don’t have the answers to these questions. Perhaps the truth of the matter is that the Government should rely less on Whitehall dictat and more on localised common sense to allow councils and their highly committed staff to get on with things. Whatever the truth of the matter let me make one prediction. That enquiries established will increase the bumph, paperwork and bureaucracy as people cover their backs. That won’t save more Baby P’s. It will ensure that the number who die will increase.

Cllr Richard Kemp is the Deputy Chair of the LGA where he also leads the Liberal Democrat Group.

He is a councillor in Liverpool.

Advertisements

About richardkemp

Leader of the Liberal Democrats in Liverpool. . Deputy Chair and Lib Dem Spokesperson on the LGA Community Wellbeing Board. Married to the lovely Cllr Erica Kemp CBE with three children and four grandchildren.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s